<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Recent Posts in 'EMF' | Beast</title>
    <link>http://forum.warmlyyours.com/forums/1/topics/18</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>60</ttl>
    <atom:link type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://forum.warmlyyours.com/open_search.xml" rel="search"/>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>EMF replied by slavigne @ Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:56:19 -0000</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Bob,&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Sorry about the delay on getting you an answer.  &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EMF&lt;/span&gt; has become quite the topic over the last few months.  Firstly, anything that has electricity flowing through it produces some &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EMF&lt;/span&gt;.  The debate over whether or not electromagnetic fields are harmful has been going on for years; as of yet there is no concrete study that shows any substantial heath risks associated with &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EMF&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;One of the interesting properties of electromagnetic fields is the rate at which the effects diminish with distance from the source.  Standing directly under high-voltage power lines will expose you to quite high levels, but at a distance of 300 feet the effects have all but disappeared.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Our system has been tested to &lt;span class="caps"&gt;IEC&lt;/span&gt; standards 61000-6-1, 61000-6-4, and &lt;span class="caps"&gt;CISPR 11&lt;/span&gt;.  At a distance of 1&amp;#8221; the testing rendered an &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EMF&lt;/span&gt; result of 1.8mG.  This is almost 600 times lower than the assumed safe level for &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EMF&lt;/span&gt; exposure.  To put this in perspective the computer monitor you are sitting in front of right now is producing an average of 67.45 mG at a distance of 1&amp;#8217;.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;As our system is set in a layer of thinset cement and then tiled over, you are almost always farther than 1&amp;#8221; from the system.  The &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EMF&lt;/span&gt; at that distance is completely negligible.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I hope this clears up some of your questions, if anything else comes up, please don&amp;#8217;t hesitate to contact me in the office.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;Seth Lavigne&lt;br /&gt;Lead Technician&lt;br /&gt;800.875.5285 ext.815&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:56:19 -0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">forum.warmlyyours.com:1:18:40</guid>
      <author>slavigne</author>
      <link>http://forum.warmlyyours.com/forums/1/topics/18</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EMF replied by ryalvis @ Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:57:13 -0000</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have used Warmly Yours floor heating mats several times over the past 5 years (in fact I picked up the first one at the original house location in Long Grove) and never considered the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EMF&lt;/span&gt; question until I read some literature from another company that claims to have a zero &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EMF&lt;/span&gt; system.  Their position is that an &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EMF&lt;/span&gt; could be possibly be harmful to a person lying on the floor for an extended period of time and could interfere with TV, mobile phone, etc. tranmissions.  What is the Warmly Yours situation regarding &lt;span class="caps"&gt;EMF&lt;/span&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:57:13 -0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">forum.warmlyyours.com:1:18:39</guid>
      <author>ryalvis</author>
      <link>http://forum.warmlyyours.com/forums/1/topics/18</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
